What is Article 13 Article 17 & How Does it Affect You?

These are the countries that could challenge the copyright directive and possibly change the course of its implementation in the future. In a very informative blog post, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki shared her company’s views of the new law. The post starts by saying that YouTube has never been as popular as today, with the number of 1+ million subscriptions increasing 75%, year over year. At the same time, Wojcicki talks about the dangers of Article 13 (now known as Article 17) and how the company is under siege in the European Union. Video gamers who share their gameplay on video-streaming services such as Twitch and YouTube highlight the complexity of copyright online.

More likely however, explains Kretschmer, the UK civil service just kept their heads down during the copyright negotiations, unwilling to draw attention at a sensitive moment for the Withdrawal Agreement. Although the Article 13 vote has been passed by the European Parliament, this doesn’t mean its provisions take place straight away. The Directive on Copyright has gained vocal critics on both sides of the debate, but you can broadly chunk up defenders and detractors into two categories. On May 23, the Polish Prime Minister’s office announced it would bring a court case against Article 13 to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Additionally make sure your User-Agent is not empty and is something unique and descriptive and try again. If you’re supplying an alternate User-Agent string,try changing back to default as that can sometimes result in a block. As noted earlier, Article 13 become Article 17 in the final form of the Directive, which went through a series of (minor) changes. In the final text, memes and GIFs were specifically mentioned as being excluded from the new law.

It was introduced to the public in the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (Copyright Directive), a comprehensive copyright and licensing directive that sets overarching standards for the European Union (EU). Article 13 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market implied a potential ban on memes — and people had a lot to say about it. Not long ago, when the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) https://www.topforexnews.org/investing/the-best-types-of-investments-for-various-goals/ was still new, another controversial piece of European legislation caused an internet uproar. We’ll have to wait and see if VPNs will do their job even after the new directive comes into action. At the moment, it looks like using a VPN to preserve your right to freedom and free speech should not be affected – so it’s good to know that you’ll still have a valuable tool to continue using the Web like you’re using it right now.

1. Press publications “may obtain fair and proportionate remuneration for the digital use of their press publications by information society service providers,” the Directive states.
2. Mass monitoring of that scale necessitates automation, likely in the form of upload filters.
3. No, Article 13, which became Article 17 in the final version of the directive, did not end up banning internet memes.
4. It’s become known by the most controversial segment, Article 13, which critics claim will have a detrimental impact on creators online.
5. This also happened with the new EU Copyright Directive, whose full name is ‘Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market’.

If you think that we’ve incorrectly blocked you or you would like to discusseasier https://www.forex-world.net/stocks/pepsico/ ways to get the data you want, please file a ticket here.

The final text renamed ‘Article 13’ to ‘Article 17’ and it has been passed by the European Parliament under its final name. The article intends to get news aggregator sites, such as Google News, to pay publishers for using snippets of their articles on their platforms. Press publications “may obtain fair and proportionate remuneration for the digital use of their press publications by information society service providers,” the Directive states. The Directive on Copyright would make online platforms and aggregator sites liable for copyright infringements, and supposedly direct more revenue from tech giants towards artists and journalists. If you continue reading, you’ll learn all there’s to know about Article 13 (or Article 17, as it’s called now).

This means that each EU country will now have to implement the new laws and enact the Direct under their national laws. This isn’t as surprising as this website relies on user-generated content and will be directly affected by Article 17. The core part of Article 17 consists of theoretical measures that companies need to use to prevent copyright infringement. These should be ‘effective content recognition systems’ that automatically detect problematic content and before it gets removed from the Web.

But technology is adapting rapidly, and Europe has already passed other regulations that impact the digital space. However, the controversial draft of the directive was finalized on February 13, 2019. To this day, even with the meme ban never occurring, a quick internet search for Article 13 yields several negative responses and old content from 2019. In a humorous twist, some users created memes about the possible ban on memes, like the hand-drawn version of a popular Drake meme pictured below, originally posted on Reddit by user Yamezj.

What is Article 13 (Now Called Article – Europe’s New Copyright Directive Aims to Limit Your Freedom!

In fact, Google conducted a study to test how this could impact aggregate news platforms and independent publishers and found a 45% drop in traffic to the publishing news outlets. Draft Article 13 caused controversy because its initial phrasing implied that the responsibility for ensuring copyright compliance fell on the service and not the content creators. “Studios tend not to enforce their rights against YouTube gamers in order to avoid the PR implications of being heavy-handed with fans, and because the videos can have significant promotional value,” said Ms Berry. In theory, if Article 13 became law, games studios could tell Twitch and YouTube not to show videos of its games. Many in the entertainment industry support Article 13, as it will hold websites accountable if they fail to license material or take it down. Google has been particularly vocal about the proposed law, which it says could “change the web as we know it”.

Will Article 13 affect video game streamers?

“I can’t imagine YouTube packing up and saying, ‘well we’re not going to stream any content to France’,” says Erickson. Countries will simply have to implement stricter filters, and deal with potential court cases. “It creates more administrative how to start white label forex brokerage step by step guide red tape for them, but their services are still going to be available,” he says. Unless the Polish court case changes anything – and that’s a big if – individual member states will have two years to turn the new rules into their own national law.

Who is for and against the Directive?

The public responses to the potential meme ban and other provisions of the Copyright Directive draft were far more negative than the reactions to the two data protection laws. The proposed law will face a final vote in the European Parliament in the next few weeks. If it passes, it will be implemented by national governments over the next two years.

Interestingly enough, particular attention has been paid to the status of ‘Internet memes’ as an example of how copyrighted material is used and shared across the Web. Well, Article 13 was the one that stirred plenty of attention once being revealed publicly. Directly related to the filtering of copyrighted content and making big tech companies liable for hosting such content (even without their knowledge), it’s poised to have long-term consequences for everyone involved. However, ‘Article 13’ was a name for this specific subset of the EU Copyright Directive.

No, Article 13, which became Article 17 in the final version of the directive, did not end up banning internet memes. The simplest (and the most effective) way to circumvent the new law is by using a VPN. These applications let you connect to a server located in some other country, and therefore browse the Web like you’re physically located in that country. This means that if you use a VPN to connect to a server found in the USA, you will get to download and watch content not available in your country.

For instance, the move could be a small boon to smaller startups who cannot afford the kind of content ID systems YouTube has. “My prediction would be that not implementing Article 17 would make the UK more attractive for running platform businesses,” says Reda. But this would likely be a small consideration about whether to do business outside the EU, in comparison to the other consequences of Brexit. The Copyright Directive officially took effect on June 7, 2019, and the Member States had until June 7, 2021, to establish laws supporting the directive.